Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christy Shaver's avatar

Suzanne, this piece lands for me because it refuses to look away from history.

We did not dismantle the systems that enabled slavery, internment, genocide, and land theft. We renamed things. We apologized decades later. But we did not do the structural work to make sure those patterns could not reassemble. Systems that are not dismantled will reorganize.

That is what feels so urgent in what you shared. The battle for ideas is not abstract. It is about whether we are willing to confront the architecture of oppression, the policies, incentives, and narratives that normalize cruelty, and interrupt it before it hardens again.

If we are going to talk about an uplifted world, it has to include accountability. It has to include a sober reckoning with power, history, and the ways harm is reproduced in plain sight. Refusing to normalize injustice is part of that work, but so is rebuilding institutions, shifting policy, telling the truth about history, and committing to long term structural change.

Dr Marc B Cooper's avatar

In my view, it is a human trait, perhaps built into our DNA, to have a morality as a core value. And when morality becomes trashed or eliminated, there is a yearning, an intention, a kind of suffering, to have it be restored. So, my view is that the "collective intent" to advance the "end" is driven by the longing to restore morality in our culture, our politics, and ourselves.

16 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?